Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 18:27:53 +0100 (MET) From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) To: se@freefall.freebsd.org (Stefan Esser) Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/benchmarks/bytebench - Imported sources Message-ID: <199601021727.SAA00561@allegro.lemis.de> In-Reply-To: <199601012257.OAA14656@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Stefan Esser" at Jan 1, 96 02:57:37 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Esser writes: > > se 96/01/01 14:57:37 > > Branch: benchmarks/bytebench 1.1.1 > Log: > The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. > (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) > > This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance > number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the > performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... Is this this nonsense that iX publishes? Do we really want it? It's one of the most meaningless benchmarks I've ever seen (along with all the others that iX publishes). Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601021727.SAA00561>