From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 10 20:16:50 2000 From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:16:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9223837B400 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 12898 invoked by uid 100); 11 Dec 2000 04:16:44 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14900.21804.426787.246572@guru.mired.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:16:44 -0600 (CST) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation In-Reply-To: <14900.19591.200496.869754@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <14898.33404.356173.963351@guru.mired.org> <14898.31393.228926.763711@guru.mired.org> <200012100904.CAA27546@harmony.village.org> <3A336781.94E1646@newsguy.com> <14899.41809.754369.259894@guru.mired.org> <200012101557.KAA29588@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <14899.43958.622675.847234@guru.mired.org> <20001210120840.C38697@vger.bsdhome.com> <14899.47196.795281.662619@zircon.seattle.wa.us> <14899.49294.958909.82912@guru.mired.org> <14899.62738.768609.598990@nomad.yogotech.com> <14899.62189.243395.903919@nomad.yogotech.com> <14900.2598.958785.326648@guru.mired.org> <14900.19591.200496.869754@nomad.yogotech.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nate Williams types: > I ran mostly DEC boxes until the early 90s, which had all software > installed in /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin. Well, I ran DEC boxes for Dec (at WSE) back in the late 80s and early 90s, and don't remember anything being in /usr/local that I didn't drag of the net (or write myself) and install there, on either VAXen or MIPS boxes. > > By your own admission, /usr/local wasn't used on v7. So the discussion > > should turn to when BSD started seeing prebuilt vendor packages to > > install in /usr/local. > Late '80s on DEC boxes running Ultrix (which one could argue is one of > the earliest commercial 'vendor' BSD unices). I don't consider Solaris > a BSD unix, so it using /opt isn't a valid point, which makes the whole > concept of '/opt' for BSD packages a moot point. :) I wish people would quite acting like moving packages out of /usr/local meant going to something like /opt. I don't think anyone in their right mind would suggest that. > Probably the same time-frame for SunOS, although I didn't have > experience with it until the early 90's. However, if necessary, I can > try and dig out installation docs for some software which ask to have > the stuff unpacked in /usr/local. I'd certainly be interested in that. Of course, as you yourself said, the argument about tradition is a sideline. The real issue is that ports/packages have one source, and things that may *not* have a mechanism to move them out of /usr/local (however badly broken) have another some of us want - quite legitimately - want to treat those two things differently, and packages using a directory name that has an established use makes that difficult.