Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 02:26:59 -0500 From: Dan Cross <tenser@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu> To: davidn@unique.usn.blaze.net.au (David Nugent) Cc: obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu (David O'Brien), chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey), imp@village.org, ache@nagual.ru, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only Message-ID: <19970110072700.14982.qmail@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:12:36 %2B1100." <Mutt.19970110131236.davidn@labs.blaze.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No, they don't have sys/param.h. It is a BSDism that is only > recently being more widely adopted. IIRC, AIX and DG's UNIX > don't have it either. I don't currently have access to either > HPUX or IRIX systems to check, but I somehow doubt that either > use it. Which version of AIX? 4.2 has it. IRIX does as well, though I don't have access to the others to check either. Personally, I'm leaning towards __44bsd__, since it just seems cleaner to me. - Dan C.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970110072700.14982.qmail>