From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 27 11:26:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A79479 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F218FC08 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdJJL-0001D2-BO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:26:43 -0800 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:26:43 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> References: <50AA8C85.2000002@netfence.it> <176051353355653@web21f.yandex.ru> <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:26:44 -0000 If it is really mandatory on i386, why there is option at all? According to man, while apic is mandatory on amd64 there is no corresponding config or NOTES entry. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764584.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.