Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:00:13 +0200 From: alson+ml@alm.flutnet.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...) Message-ID: <20090729200013.GB2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> In-Reply-To: <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A707534.8000808@FreeBSD.org> <20090729170601.GA2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> [2009-07-29 20:48]: > How about this? When the user has -[rf] but not -R, and there are flag > files present, ask if they should be cleared before beginning to do > anything. Otherwise (no -[rf]) ignore them. Sound good? Sounds like a good solution for both problems (stale flag files and unexpected removal). It should default to removing the files with -u. I think that -R is a very useful feature of portmaster, so I'm happy to see it getting improved. Thanks! Alson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090729200013.GB2841>