From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 5 12: 9:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F193937B426 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA01486; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 07:09:04 +1100 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 07:11:31 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Mike Silbersack Cc: Michal Mertl , , Subject: Re: stack alignment issues In-Reply-To: <20020205134035.M1617-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Message-ID: <20020206071049.S502-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > foo: > > pushl %ebp > > movl %esp,%ebp > > subl $8,%esp # <- extra instruction for alignment (for foo) > > addl $-12,%esp # <- extra instruction for alignment (for f1) > > What disgusting code. I find it amazing that they didn't even stick in > some peephole optimizer to at least limit it to one operation. It's clearly the result of work in progress :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message