Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 16:52:02 +0200 From: horst leitenmueller <horst.leitenmueller@liwest.at> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: Mark Dixon <mnd999@gmail.com>, rodrigo@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port for Maven 3.3 Message-ID: <56ACCD82-2F84-44D4-B5F8-D9AE419AD729@liwest.at> In-Reply-To: <20151021125458.GM19913@home.opsec.eu> References: <1627508.KhBpB2Vanr@mark-thinkpad-x1-carbon> <20151021121622.GL19913@home.opsec.eu> <3010313.TBdmNM2Oy9@mark-thinkpad-x1-carbon> <20151021125458.GM19913@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi=20 there are many problems if you don=E2=80=99t have the correct maven = version=20 regarding jdk and so on=20 i like it how it is done in macports maven1 was 1.1 but now EOL = (http://maven.apache.org/archives/maven-1.x/) maven2 was 2.2.1 but now EOL = (http://maven.apache.org/archives/maven-2.x/) maven3 keeps the latest 3 version 3.3.3 maven31 keeps latest 3.1.x version 3.1.1 maven32 keeps latest 3.2.x version 3.2.5 and maven-devel keeps the latest devel version=20 hopefully information helps, in this case you can cover most things br horst > On 21 Oct 2015, at 14:54, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> Agreed, it sounds like we need a decision on whether we want >>=20 >> devel/maven3 >> devel/maven31 >> devel/maven33 etc. >>=20 >> or=20 >>=20 >> devel/maven >=20 > Yes. I'm no real maven user, so I can't contribute experience. >=20 > The choice should be based on experience and probably some > testing, if the dependent ports still build and run with the > grand unified maven (which would be 3.3.x). >=20 >>> =46rom that ticket, there isn't a huge amount that depends on Maven = so the=20 >> consensus seemed to be for devel/maven. If that is the case I'll = cancel my bug=20 >> and try to help facilitate that. It would be good to have some goal = posts=20 >> agreed though, for where we need to get to for someone to be bold and = just=20 >> commit it. I'm new here though, so I'm not sure how this usually = works. >=20 > We try to do evidence-based computer science 8-), but have not found > anyone who had the time/skills to build and run-test the dependent > ports listed in >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D188110#c19 >=20 > Can you say something about your time-budget ? If you soon find > the time to test, I would prefer that. Otherwise, maybe it's just time > to jump into the abyss with 3.3.x 8-} >=20 > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years = to go ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56ACCD82-2F84-44D4-B5F8-D9AE419AD729>