From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Mar  6 12:48:12 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1349137BF9C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Mar 2000 12:48:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 90912 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Mar 2000 20:47:59 +0000 (GMT)
To: adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org
Cc: djb@wit389306.student.utwente.nl, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: current lockups
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:00:34 -0800"
References: <20000306120033.A16043@sharmas.dhs.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 21:47:59 +0100
Message-ID: <90910.952375679@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> The cooling theory sounds the most plausible so far. I'm not over clocking
> my CPUs (Celeron 366s) and have appropriate cooling installed. But the
> machine is kept in a small room, with a bunch of other machines and gets
> a bit warm at times.

I have seen a couple of suggestions that this may not be the CPUs - but
that the 82443BX chip (the one with the large green cooling fin) doesn't
always get sufficient cooling on a BP6 board. Some thermal compound
between the 82443BX and the cooling fin may be a good idea.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message