Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:11:14 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/converters/libiconv Makefile distinfo pkg-plistports/converters/libiconv/files patch-tests patch-ab patch-adpatch-ae Message-ID: <20010827111114.D35352@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B8A0A69.74B81266@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:52:57AM %2B0300 References: <200108260053.f7Q0r3871490@freefall.freebsd.org> <3B8A0A69.74B81266@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:52:57AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > Where did you send your message to? I am unable to locate it neither in my > gnome@ archives nor in ports@ archivers. This is *totally* unacceptable and I > hope that would be the last time you touch core gnome ports without *explicit* > gnome@ approval. Um, it's also core kde ports too (via libxml2 dependency for xml/xsl support for help kioslave). Should I demand that everybody pass their patch requests for it through kde@ too? :) Next time, how about raising a real objection? Something along the lines of "This breaks so and so...", particularly if nobody in gnome@ got the mail he claims to have sent? Thanks :-) -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010827111114.D35352>