Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:25:46 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/acpi/acpiconf acpiconf.c Message-ID: <20040306102511.R38217@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200403061118.32829.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200403051335.55836.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20040305101907.P30482@root.org> <200403061118.32829.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 05:05, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > I see value in being able to get to the raw battery information from > > whatever system is present. > > > > Now, having said that, I have no problems with there being a unified > > interface also. I don't think that we can shoe-horn all systems into > > providing all this information. > > I think it would be sensible to leave /dev/apm as is since a lot of > applications already know how to talk to it.. /dev/apm is going nowhere since that is the main user interface that is used by apps like xbatt. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040306102511.R38217>