From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jun 27 22:43:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA02355 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 22:43:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ilium.troy.msen.com (ilium.troy.msen.com [148.59.4.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA02337 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 22:43:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wayne@ilium.troy.msen.com) Received: by ilium.troy.msen.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0yqAEy-0003cUC; Sun, 28 Jun 98 01:43 EDT Message-Id: To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ETinc cards, PPP and OSPF From: wayne@msen.com Date: Sun, 28 Jun 98 01:43:03 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Please reply TO ME and not just to the list as I am still waiting (3 days now) for my subscription to this list to be approved. We are doing an evaluation of the ETinc T1 cards, using them in PPP mode. So far, I have been completely unable to get them to respond to OSPF packets from our routers. Since the interfaces supplied by ETinc cards do not operate in multicast mode, I have added to my gated.conf interfaces { define 148.59.21.129 pointtopoint 148.59.21.130 ; } ; but this seems to not make a difference (the router remains in INIT state) sending multicast packets at the ETinc card and the ETinc card never responds. I assume that I am missing something obvious but need a fresh outlook on this problem as I have run out of ideas. /\/\ \/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message