Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:24:18 -0500 From: "Andy Greenwood" <greenwood.andy@gmail.com> To: "David Schulz" <davidschulz@tca-cable-connector.com> Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IPFW and PF Message-ID: <3ee9ca710610300524y7db3dc1bg56e144b452d90dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E4B019F7-1067-45C3-AF93-CF0980A57471@tca-cable-connector.com> References: <E4B019F7-1067-45C3-AF93-CF0980A57471@tca-cable-connector.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
PF, for two reasons. Firstly, because I don't have to mess with arbitrary rule numbers; I can just scroll down the page and know that rules will be executed in that order. Secondly becuase I can easily integrate bruteforceblocker. On 10/28/06, David Schulz <davidschulz@tca-cable-connector.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > IPFW seems to be the same IPFW that is used on MacOSX, so it seems to > make sense to learn and lean on IPFW when using in a mixed Machine > Environment. On the other side, many People seem to say PF is easier > to manage once a setup gets complicated. As usual, both sides have > their own valid points. My question though is not whether any of the > two , IPFW of PF is better then the other, but which of the two do > you use, and why? > > Thanks, > David > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ee9ca710610300524y7db3dc1bg56e144b452d90dc>