From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 10:25:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F8D16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:25:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from helium.xe.net (helium.xe.net [216.220.37.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1AB43D45 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:25:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bfarmer@xe.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ws-gw.tor.xe.net [216.220.37.73]) by helium.xe.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i02IPpKM076088; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 13:25:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 13:25:52 -0500 From: Beric Farmer To: Daniel Ortiz Message-ID: <13654202.1073049952@[192.168.1.100]> In-Reply-To: <20040102114156.GB7190@in.ilimit.es> References: <20040102114156.GB7190@in.ilimit.es> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atacontrol/udma X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 18:25:54 -0000 --On January 02, 2004 12:41 +0100 Daniel Ortiz wrote: > > The question is: How I can set the transfer to any other UDMA? > FreeBSD detects ther hardware but I can't use that features without > ATAng? Any patch/solution/idea? > My understanding is that 4.x doesn't have support for SATA. Evidently, the developers have been focusing on 5.x, and the necessary changes are non-trivial and not straightforward to apply to 4.x. >From what I've read, you'll need to use 5.x in order to get support for your SATA drives. I ran into this problem under 4.9-RELEASE. As a test, I booted from the 5.1-RELEASE CD and the SATA drives were properly detected, and not downgraded to UDMA33. I've sort of been waiting for the official word that 5.x is ready for production usage before I run with it (the documentation still recommends that "conservative users" not upgrade). Hope this helps. Beric