From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 3 16: 4: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grace.speakeasy.org (grace.speakeasy.org [216.254.0.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DC037B869 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:03:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjoseph@speakeasy.org) Received: from 11-112.009.popsite.net (11-112.009.popsite.net [207.227.233.112]) by grace.speakeasy.org (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e33N2Zg16105; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:02:50 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:55:59 -0700 (PDT) From: R Joseph Wright X-Sender: rjoseph@mammalia.sea To: Doug Barton Cc: Brennan W Stehling , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make world failed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > The makeworld.html page has side notes for 2.2.5, but nothing for the > > current and stable versions. It just makes sense to me that any important > > changes would be reflect on that page. Afterall, it is the official > > FreeBSD handbook while the mailing list may not offer accurate help. > > Your logic is flawed. Sorry to jump in in the middle of this thread, but I must agree with Brennan that FreeBSD's online documentation is woefully incomplete. A person upgrading from 3.x to 4.0-release shouldn't have to subscribe to a mailing list. Let me use www.perl.apache.org as an example. You will not find more complete and detailed documentation anywhere. There is more information on how to use mod_perl with apache on that site than there is information for the entire FreeBSD operating system anywhere 8(. I'd like to see the FreeBSD handbook achieve that level of quality and detail. At that point, I think the flames people get for not reading the docs would make more sense. I'd be glad to help in this area, as I'm a very good writer. Can someone point me in the right direction? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message