Date: 06 Sep 2002 14:33:23 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla failure on 4.6.2 Message-ID: <1031337204.342.49.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <15736.59259.51892.798026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <20020906040641.GA61111@xor.obsecurity.org> <1031287598.361.2.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.40749.986834.818558@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031329151.342.9.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.58229.652949.93794@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031333130.342.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.59259.51892.798026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 13:35, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Joe Marcus Clarke writes: > > > Are you saying that there's something different about the calling > > > conventions that would make using the linux code as it stands > > > incorrect? > > > > I don't know. However, I am seeing core dumps on the port-build and > > when executing mozilla that point to xptcall. Admittedly, I don't have > > an Alpha to test with myself. Jan had been generous enough to allow me > > to login to his. He is running 4.6.2, so I have not been able to test > > -stable or -current. > > > > However, tests with gcc31 in ports, and with varying degrees of > > optimizations have yielded no success on Alpha. > > > > Do you know what, if any, differences there are between our g++ and > the one linux uses? I'll be the first to admit that I don't know jack > about g++/c++. Sorry, neither do I. However, the builds of Mozilla I've seen for Linux Alpha use GCC 2.96 where as I've been testing with 2.95.x. Joe > > Drew > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1031337204.342.49.camel>