From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 23 14:19:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail11.speakeasy.net (mail11.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A51237B405 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from allen@easytospell.com) Received: (qmail 28893 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001 21:19:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO very) ([64.81.161.115]) (envelope-sender ) by mail11.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Jun 2001 21:19:24 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010623171922.00db1f18@pop.easytospell.com> X-Tag1: harvested_address@easytospell.com X-Cutter: 8< X-Knights-Who-Say-Ni: adopt a shrubbery! Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:19:22 -0400 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , "Bill Moran" , From: Allen Subject: RE: [OT] Spam from Windriver - how should I react? In-Reply-To: <000001c0fc20$7ad7f420$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> References: <3B337E1B.65DBBAAA@iowna.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:09 PM 6/23/2001 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >All that is required to classify an e-mail transmission as spam The only reason I'm commenting here is because care should be taken when defining spam so that no loop holes are left open and you don't inadvertently leave yourself standing on a slippery slope. The best definition I've seen is: http://www.monkeys.com/spam-defined/ -- Allen C mindsieve.com easytospell.com packetmonkeys.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message