From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 18:51:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D30816A468 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsf@clanhop.com) Received: from mail.nozonenet.com (mail.nozonenet.com [216.86.146.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3542F13C45D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsf@clanhop.com) Received: (qmail 17078 invoked by uid 398); 18 Jun 2007 18:24:44 -0000 To: TooMany Secrets X-PHP-Script: mail.nozonenet.com/roundcube/index.php for 206.211.142.150 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:24:44 -0500 From: In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <57b2d6ed4d38ad7407bbd41ca7bed657@localhost> X-Sender: hsf@clanhop.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to make a make install without questions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:51:24 -0000 The way I do it is: make BATCH=yes install clean Hope that helps... -Matt On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:10:29 +0200, "TooMany Secrets" wrote: > Hi! > > Excuse me if this is a estupid question, but in six years with > FreeBSD, today I haven't still an answer to this: > - If I make a "make install clean", in a port like "x11/kde3", are > there any way to make the lack of questions? Or maybe better, are > there any way to make anything like "make -y (or -Y for YES options) > install clean"? > > The trouble is ports like KDE, with platform independency (more or > less cpu power), take more time because you need to stay (more or > less) in front of computer to choose and accept the port options. > I understand that you don't need this with other ports (like apache, > php, etc), for obvious reasons. But I think that with ports like > gnome2 or kde3, maybe I believe that it would be a great saving of > time. > > Sorry if the question is understandable for my bad english. > > -- > Have a nice day ;-) > TooManySecrets > > ============================ > Dijo Confucio: > "Exígete mucho a ti mismo y espera poco de los demás. Así te ahorrarás > disgustos." > ============================ >