From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 21 13:28:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.1.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D35715F43 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:21:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu) Received: from sol.cs.binghamton.edu (cs1-gw.cs.binghamton.edu [128.226.171.72]) by bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA04814 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 16:21:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 16:06:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Zhihui Zhang To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The -o port=xxx option in NFS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > The mount_nfs manual says I can use -o port= to specify > a port number for NFS requests. Which port number should I use: the port > number of the portmapper (111), the port number of the mountd daemon, or > the port number of the nfsd daemon? I also suppose I can use the > following command: > > # mount -o port=xxx host:directory directory > > and the -o port=xxx part will be passed onto the mount_nfs. Is this > right? > In answering myself, the port number should be 2049. -Zhihui To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message