From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 10 10:53:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA13636 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA13613 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA15267 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:55:36 GMT Received: from buffnet3.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa09588; 10 Mar 96 13:59 EST Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:59:48 -0500 (EST) From: Superuser To: Nate Williams cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: typeahead In-Reply-To: <199603101639.JAA09382@rocky.sri.MT.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk tOn Sun, 10 Mar 1996, Nate Williams wrote: > > One of my users pointed out that the programs we run on freebsd (pine, > > tin, trn etc) dont behave as they do under sco in one basic respect. > > > > There seems to be in sco a typeahead buffner, and not on the freebsd. > > This is a bug in SCO's termio/termios implementation. You aren't > supposed to be able to type-ahead in raw mode. :( I keeping finding 'bugs' in my sco implementation though that I wish I could introduce to freebsd! :) Oh well. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Hovey -- shovey@buffnet.net root@buffnet.net