Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:08:37 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config Message-ID: <BANLkTikq3nB6Oe24JGhdJX=vnoVsO7UELw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106011433070.19512@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105300842550.9995@wonkity.com> <BANLkTikUwUp8AGKz9uGyjwMpD3H6D9oBFA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikRggozSjXrGUhTJrzSNaM02jfZEQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105301708120.11485@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106011433070.19512@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > A little empirical testing: > > Times for buildworld after a fresh reboot, /usr/obj/usr deleted, GENERIC > included, running ccache: > > default (486/586 included) 9:05.84 > nocpu I486, nocpu I586_CPU 9.27.88 > nocpu I486_CPU 8.53.86 > > So maybe a 6% increase by removing 486 but leaving 586... These were not > rigorous benchmarks, it might just be measurement noise. > Good to know, thanks. 6% is nothing to sneeze at. I've already updated my nanobsd builds. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikq3nB6Oe24JGhdJX=vnoVsO7UELw>