Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:32:37 -0500 (EST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Subject:   Re: Kernel panic on 4.7-STABLE to 5.0 RC2 upgrade.
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20030109133237.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <3E1CD671.29FCBE72@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 09-Jan-2003 Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>> Terry Lambert wrote:
>> > Because RC2 was not tagged, because We Fear CVS Tags(tm), you
>> > will need to use a date in order to create your own RC2.
>> 
>> Perhaps release build team are trying to avoid touching every file
>> in the CVS tree, as global touching costs people receiving on modems
>> & non flat rate extra telecom charges, (regardless of whether receiving
>> via CVSup or CTM etc).
> 
> I'm well aware of that (see other post).
> 
> 
>> RC2 seems important though; so Although there's no tag in src/Makefile,v
>> is there a CVS file containing a table of dates corresponding to
>> EG RC2, RC1 etc ?  (& if one doesnt exist, how about creating one ?).
> 
> RC2 has additional changes, above and beyond a simple date tag
> (see other post; I believe it was managed in P4, and you could
> use _that_ to recover it).  A tag, in this case, would only be
> useful if the other RC2 changes (string changes, hacks to suppress
> known bugs, etc., mostly) were made in a branch off the tag, in
> the main source tree, rather than in P4.  Not a convenient option,
> all around, I'm afraid, though I agree that release candidates
> should be tagged in the tree, so they can be recovered, for archival
> reasons, if nothing else.  8-(.

This is incorrect.  Only DP1 and DP2 have diff's relative to current.
The RC's are cut directly from -current.

> The main point, though,  is about getting the same sources for the
> RC2 that won't install, in order to build an RC2 that's identical,
> so it won't install, and then build an RC2 with a kernel with
> symbols and DDB and BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER, so we can find out *why* it
> won't install.

These bits are quite easily obtained from the tarballs in the RC2
release that are available both via FTP and on the CD. :)

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030109133237.jhb>