Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 00:14:59 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk> To: thomas@chelseai.com Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for Dual Athlon MP FreeBSD Version recommendations Message-ID: <20030418221458.GD385@nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <200304141433.AEX27389@ms4.verisignmail.com> References: <200304141433.AEX27389@ms4.verisignmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.04.14 10:33:24 -0400, thomas@chelseai.com wrote: > I'm very interested in running 5.0 so that I can take=20 > advantage of the SMP enhancements, but I'm also worried that=20 > it may not be very stable for my configuration. I don't think you will get better performance from 5.0, more likely worse. That being said I think the chances are good that if you install 5.0 it will run just fine. I'm running 5.0 on a dual 800Mhz P3 and it has been runing very well. > Also, if you have a recommendation for one or the other, are=20 > there specific kernel/tuning parameters to make sure I=20 > include or to make sure I avoid like the plague? I just run a GENERIC+SMP kernel.. Btw. this is properly a bit more on-topic somewhere else like freebsd-current. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+oHji8kocFXgPTRwRArkGAKC8T+AVZTih3eosB8/ClYG5LAJbbACaAzCC Dt2DLjEAURv9jW8SdV7rgco= =dBLR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030418221458.GD385>