Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:43:22 +0100
From:      Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
Cc:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: bindat(2) and connectat(2) syscalls for review.
Message-ID:  <20130217144321.GJ2023@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20130217142038.GA55034@stack.nl>
References:  <20130213230354.GC1375@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130213232004.GA2522@kib.kiev.ua> <20130213234030.GD1375@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130214185549.GA36288@stack.nl> <86ip5saqiu.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20130216232039.GD2023@garage.freebsd.pl> <86y5enaan7.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20130217142038.GA55034@stack.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--k+G3HLlWI7eRTl+h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:20:38PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:21:00AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> > Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > > > Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> writes:
> > > > > A flag parameter is a good thing; you may not know yet what you w=
ill
> > > > > need it for.
> > > > int bind(int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen);
> > > > int connect(int s, const struct sockaddr *name, socklen_t namelen);
> > > > Where's the flag argument?
> > > The is no flag argument in my patch, but it was proposed by Kostik in
> > > the e-mail Jilles replied to.
>=20
> > That was a rhetorical question...  unless Jilles wants to go through our
> > entire code base and add a flag argument to every syscall or library
> > function that doesn't already have one, "just in case".
>=20
> The point is not to add a flags argument everywhere for the sake of it;
> rather, to add a flags argument if a function is extended or created
> anyway. This leaves some space for future extensibility.
>=20
> For example, POSIX considered eaccess() not useful enough, but when
> access() was extended to faccessat(), a flag argument was added which
> allowed the eaccess() functionality.

But if we are going to do that, it would be nice to have at least one
useful flag to use in there:)

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer                         http://www.FreeBSD.org
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!                     http://tupytaj.pl

--k+G3HLlWI7eRTl+h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlEg7IkACgkQForvXbEpPzRkMQCgl22uax6ucfmuYmxp0DrQ9Ufe
19sAoNophK9ls8gYVjnbuTOd9yAOru8j
=8o6B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k+G3HLlWI7eRTl+h--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130217144321.GJ2023>