Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:13:48 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: James Pole <james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cyrix CPUs, was: Re: Repeatable crash from nautilus2 Message-ID: <3DF996BC.7070009@gmx.net> References: <20021213021012.61714.qmail@web40303.mail.yahoo.com> <004901c2a25c$0c381c50$0301a8c0@prime> <1039756076.12023.5.camel@localhost> <3DF974C6.3070901@gmx.net> <1039764208.12365.12.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
James Pole wrote: > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 18:48, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>James Pole wrote: >> >>>I think the fact Cyrix isn't very popular these days >> >>Ain't the VIA C3-CPUs everyone wants likes so much CYRIX-Technology, too? > > They have less than one percent of the market. I have, personally, never > seen a Cyrix/VIA-powered computer over the past few years. Looking at > benchmark scores, Cyrix is always near the bottom. Even a Celeron at > could probably beat a C3 processor at twice the clock speed.... Well, they are new and they compete on power-consumption/perfomance ratio... but this is getting off-topic & stuff, I'll shut up now ;) -- Regards, Michael Nottebrock To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DF996BC.7070009>