From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 19:29:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4C2106564A for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EF58FC15 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so5531897iae.13 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:29:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MHoWFqOQeQUNljOia5gCfCbz2esF1t8wSbxfGxsk/Gs=; b=Xet7xLpkx7J1Zy1wkAG+fa4tzlutqho6K4akz8tdjMLHwFB17Liluez617srBO3bDv z0dIZ8tnmVhqVNfJg3gdK2KsSosVsLKkNNWznknaun+mETXvIftykmIhu2VlZUdS86Ec 0idFZbTokjuFa+qkagX4rkmc7h6ALxVIcDvWg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.15.231 with SMTP id a7mr4830633igd.20.1328210997193; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:29:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120202170910.GB28461@lonesome.com> References: <4F296566.805@secnap.com> <20120202051921.GC6434@lonesome.com> <4F2A494F.5000807@secnap.com> <20120202170910.GB28461@lonesome.com> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:29:56 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell Subject: Re: not for arch? use arch? don't care arch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:29:58 -0000 On 2 Feb 2012 17:09, "Mark Linimon" wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:38:38AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > > We don't build sparc packages, so no Pavmail. > > Gee, I sure *thought* I was building sparc64 packages: > > $ showrunning | grep sparc64 > sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edu math/labplot > sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edu math/p5-GIS-Distance-Lite > sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edumath/p5-Geo-Coordinates-UTM > sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edumath/p5-Math-Algebra-Symbols > sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/coinmp > sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/p5-Bit-ShiftReg > sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/p5-Date-Handler > sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.demath/p5-GIS-Distance-Fast > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com mail/quickml > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/fung-calc > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/guppi > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/kseg > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/lapacke > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/libflame > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/naturalmath > sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.commath/p5-AI-NeuralNet-BackProp > > Yep. I am. > > So, pav runs the amd64 ones, erwin runs the i386 ones, I run sparc64 and > powerpc (32-bit mode). Once every few weeks one of my runs actually > finishes. > > I send out mail whenever I mark things broken, but I don't necessarily > expect anyone to take action, it's more FYI. > My bad ;) sorry.... Chris