From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 05:10:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C232F16A41F; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 05:10:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao03.cox.net (eastrmmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA10A43D46; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 05:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by eastrmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050911051035.RUBU29674.eastrmmtao03.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:10:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:10:55 -0500 To: "Norikatsu Shigemura" References: <200509110358.j8B3wkob098825@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050911134806.65920cba.nork@FreeBSD.org> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050911134806.65920cba.nork@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.02 (Linux, build 1272) Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/acroread Makefile pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 05:10:38 -0000 On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:48:06 -0500, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:03:01 -0500 > "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: >> > Add a symlink of nppdf.so into X11BASE/lib/browser_plugins. >> > Bump PORTREVISION. >> I personal don't think it's good idea. browser-plugins is the place >> where >> all native go in, not Linux binary. Linux binary can cause some troubles > > Really? Is there a policy that browser-plugins is the place > where all native go in? > > So I think that linuxpluginwrapper should not be installed > symlinks to Linux binaries. To support Linux binaries with > linuxpluginwrapper, browsers should be used > X11BASE/lib/browser_linux_plugins? Yep, I would love to see browser_linux_plugins for Linux binary. >> for the other browsers and apps. > > How troubles? Apps cannot dynamic-link to Linux binaries > without linuxpluginwrapper. I feel much more safe if it's in the different place other than browser-plugins for avoid future conflict if Adobe, Macromedia and etc have decided to create a native one. Also, it will be nice to have browser_linux_plugins for all other Linux browsers (linux-opera, linux-firefox and etc) can point on the browser_linux_plugins in case if we want to add Linux version of mplayerplug-in and etc. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org