From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 18:20:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B73106564A for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 18:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324148FC12 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 18:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [92.117.234.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0184F8A0132; Mon, 5 May 2008 20:20:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <481F4FD3.8060406@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 20:20:03 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080503) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <539c60b90805051042r7a5524a7lebe7417cd96a249c@mail.gmail.com> <42083015@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <42083015@ipt.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stevefranks@ieee.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wine, amd64, and fc-7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 18:20:18 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hello Steve, > > > On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:42:52 -0700 Steve Franks wrote: > >> Anyone try to get an rpm of wine working under linux compat? Did you >> have to install fc-7 instead of fc-4? Is fc7 ready for primetime? >> Someone said it had issues awhile back. > > It's not and fc (port) issue, it's rather kernel's one > (linux.osrelease 2.4.2 vs 2.6.16 emulation). The default is 2.4.2 even > for CURRENT (but mat change soon). And when the default > linux.osrelease is changed at CURRENT some time will pass before > something like f8 (or even f9) may become a default linux emulation > port. > >> Looks like all the 64-bit linux guys run wine, why don't we? Of > > FreeBSD doesn't have 64-bit linux emulation, it's 32-bit for now. > And afaik no one is working on it. > >> course, I'd prefer a native FreeBSD port over an rpm if I could get >> it... I'm trying to get it to work in a 32-Bit Jail. I ain't there yet, though. It seems parts of the code for dynamicilly loading 32bit libraries is broken. Should I succeed I will create a Wiki article, containing patches and a howto to set things up. And of course the ports@ list would get informed.