From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 19 14:37:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DF516A4FF; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:37:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B734A13C448; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (qdovsj@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2JEZwRP036992; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:36:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l2JEZwjn036991; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:35:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:35:58 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200703191435.l2JEZwjn036991@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG, Axel.Rau@chaos1.de In-Reply-To: <1FDE5616-AF00-416F-B8E8-1D6A584B1126@chaos1.de> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-database User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:36:03 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: New Opteron box, dedicated to PostgreSQL X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG, Axel.Rau@chaos1.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:37:03 -0000 Axel Rau wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Be sure to disable background fsck via /etc/rc.conf. I've > > seen it breaking file systems under certain circumstances. > > Good to know. What about softupdates? It makes a bit of a difference, but not a big one. Note that you should enable fsync in the PostgreSQL config anyway, which defeats the purpose of softupdates somewhat. If you disable fsync (and you know what you're doing), using softupdates will probably improve i/o performance significantly, but I haven't tried that. Note that you might lose data if you setup your DB server that way. Best regards Oliver PS: Please respect the Reply-To header. I don't need to receive a separate copy of the mail; I'm reading the list. -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the last time you needed one?" -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal