Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:34:46 +0800
From:      Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        kib@FreeBSD.org, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT/CFR] machine independent sf_bufs
Message-ID:  <20140730053446.GA44008@ns.kevlo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140729180043.GG89995@glebius.int.ru>
References:  <20140719062725.GB85917@FreeBSD.org> <20140729104156.GD89995@FreeBSD.org> <A40E0DEE-153A-4698-AFC9-657DD4C56E05@freebsd.org> <20140729180043.GG89995@glebius.int.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:00:43PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> M> >  Sorry for top quoting, this is to annoy you :) I got zero
> M> > replies on the below email during a week. I'd really appreciate
> M> > testing on different platforms. Any takers?
> M> OK, it works on an Raspberry pi running r269231 with your patch.
> M> The only suspicious thing I observed was that the number of
> M> 'requests for I/O initiated by sendfile' in netstat -m doesn't
> M> always increase. I would expect that. However, I'm not sure if
> M> this is ARM related (I would not think so) or is related to your
> M> patch at all.
> 
> Thanks a lot, Michael!
> 
> The observation on number of I/Os is absolutely okay, since VM
> cashes pages.

Hi Gleb,

I tested your patch on FreeBSD/arm (OpenBlocks AX3), it seems to be working
fine.

> -- 
> Totus tuus, Glebius.

	Kevin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140730053446.GA44008>