From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Sep 26 13:32:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADCABE85DC; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0A21200; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.53.204.43] (unknown [88.128.80.163]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDE5E36E75; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:32:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Renato Botelho" Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r306289 - head/sys/net Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:32:01 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <625EA453-99E1-4A44-8810-99CAB2397662@FreeBSD.org> References: <201609240709.u8O79hue048932@repo.freebsd.org> <625EA453-99E1-4A44-8810-99CAB2397662@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6056) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:32:05 -0000 On 26 Sep 2016, at 15:28, Renato Botelho wrote: > > On 24 Sep 2016, at 04:09, Kristof Provost wrote: >> Author: kp >> Date: Sat Sep 24 07:09:43 2016 >> New Revision: 306289 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306289 >> >> Log: >> bridge: Fix fragment handling and memory leak >> … >> PR: 185633 >> Submitted by: Olivier Cochard-Labbé >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7780 > Do you hace plans to MFC it to stable/11 and stable/10? > I hadn’t thought about it at the time, but now that you mention it, yes that would be a good idea. I’ve added it to my todo list for next weekend. Regards, Kristof