Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:14:29 -0600
From:      Eric F Crist <ecrist@adtechintegrated.com>
To:        Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:    Re: continued IPFW issues... (actually a lack of ability on my part)
Message-ID:  <200402142014.37581.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040215020913.GA56178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
References:  <20040214233615.GB38665@users.munk.nu> <200402142001.13194.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <20040215020913.GA56178@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Boundary-02=_NYtLAa9orOLWKnp
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 14 February 2004 08:09 pm, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 08:01:07PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > My bad, I found the log entry after your prodding.  After enabling
> > logging in the ruleset and enabling the sysctl variable, I get the
> > following output in a tail /var/log/security:
> >
> > Feb 14 19:59:44 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 192.168.0.1:51598
> > 255.255.255.255:61112 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 19:59:45 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 204.147.80.1:53
> > 63.228.14.241:49152 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 19:59:46 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 204.127.202.4:53
> > 63.228.14.241:49152 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 19:59:50 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 192.168.0.1:51599
> > 255.255.255.255:61112 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 19:59:55 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 204.127.202.4:53
> > 63.228.14.241:49152 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 19:59:56 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 192.168.0.1:51600
> > 255.255.255.255:61112 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 19:59:59 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 204.147.80.5:53
> > 63.228.14.241:49152 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 20:00:02 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 204.147.80.5:53
> > 63.228.14.241:49152 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 20:00:02 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 192.168.0.1:51601
> > 255.255.255.255:61112 in via dc0
> > Feb 14 20:00:03 grog kernel: ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 204.147.80.1:53
> > 63.228.14.241:49152 in via dc0
> >
> > I would assume I need to enable a rule such as:
> >
> > ipfw add allow udp from any to me 53
> >
> > Is this correct?  TIA
>
> I don't think so.
> The entries of the form 'Deny UDP 204.147.80.1:53 63.228.14.241:49152
> in via dc0' would appear to be replies to your DNS queries.
> They go to the port from which the DNS query was sent (49152 in this
> case).
>
> You need to make sure that you allow replies to connections you
> initiate to get through.
>
> Take a look at the check-state/established/keepstate stuff people have
> repeatedly told you to use. They are probably what you want.

Well, from what I understand, isn't udp a state-less protocol?  How would=20
established/keepstate/check-state work with that?



=2D-=20
Eric F Crist
AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc
(612) 998-3588

--Boundary-02=_NYtLAa9orOLWKnp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBALtYNzdyDbTMRQIYRAkzMAKCIUfxZEXkRXGkKFBL1Nt71nNoqUACeJE5v
EwKyEwoMpsoXru++KqvgJT4=
=ht03
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_NYtLAa9orOLWKnp--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402142014.37581.ecrist>