Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:08:22 -0500 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I am confused about tracking stable Message-ID: <3A699BD6.71986D2D@mail.iowna.com> References: <14953.14800.302302.403387@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Meyer wrote: > > Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> types: > > The reason I use it is for updating my production servers. I have a test > > machine that I update to the latest -STABLE, and then test for a week. > > If everything goes fine, I then upgrade any production servers I want to > > upgrade to that EXACT version that I tested (using date tags.) Paranoid, > > I know, but I'm too lazy to fix things after the fact. > > I think that's intelligent, not paranoid. However, I wonder about > using cvsup and date tags to update the other systems. Wouldn't it be > a little easier/faster/etc. to do the nfs buildworld/installworld > split thing that's been discussed here, or rdist the source tree from > the test machine to the other machines? Yes, that's planned soon. Just haven't had time to set it up yet. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A699BD6.71986D2D>