Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: scratch65535@att.net Cc: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: standard locations for port files Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK2wFBV3-aUEYXQ3eVqMjxS2kE67G5uLVni=OEjiVe8MyA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <dolgqcpv4ihqsjbas28v0bglrboat4po5c@4ax.com> References: <59A82622.4030502@gmail.com> <729F1CC6-9A65-4CDF-B7E5-FB520779FD15@adamw.org> <dolgqcpv4ihqsjbas28v0bglrboat4po5c@4ax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, <scratch65535@att.net> wrote: > Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all > other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there > in making logs an exception? > Because logs shouldn't be under /usr. man hier -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2wFBV3-aUEYXQ3eVqMjxS2kE67G5uLVni=OEjiVe8MyA>