Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:48:36 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@sunbay.com> To: Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com> Cc: TeRrAc <terrac@cloudfactory.org>, FreeBSD IPFW list <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: natd + IPFW Message-ID: <20000810114836.A88858@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008092203330.50653-100000@rapidnet.com>; from nick@rapidnet.com on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 10:10:02PM -0600 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008091942590.8666-100000@stratus.cloudfactory.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008092203330.50653-100000@rapidnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 10:10:02PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, TeRrAc wrote: > > > So from all the replies I have recieved, i get the feeling that my natd > > is setup correctly, and the deault rules are okie.. > > I am wondering what it could be that is keeping my hosts on the inside > > from pining the outside world. > > Undoubtedly it is something really simple, as are most things. the only > > question is what is it? > > > To see what is causing your problems, Take the 'natd_flag' line > out of rc.conf. I don't think they would be the culprit but I > have never used the "-u" option so I don't know what effects that > would cause, plus it would take another "possible" out of the > equation. > The -u option tells natd(8) to NAT only RFC 1918 addresses. I would be interested in seeing the output of `ifconfig -a inet' and `sysctl net.inet.ip' commands and would recommend running natd(8) manually with -v option. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000810114836.A88858>