Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Mar 1997 21:15:32 -0800
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   An easier performance challenge 8)
Message-ID:  <199703040515.VAA00718@rah.star-gate.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


---
"H.W. Stockman" <hwstock@swcp.com> wrote:

Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> The benchmark took  14:16.58  to execute.
> 
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:02:02 :::::::START
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:02:56 :::::::START
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:12:52 :::::::START
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:13:32 :::::::START
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:14:23 :::::::START
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:19:39 :::::::START
> START::::::: ./lb  03/03/1997 18:24:25 :::::::START
> ========./lb  03/03/1997 18:38:40 ========
> STEP=600, NCOL=3100, NROW=48, xBody=0.000100, yBody=0.000000
> Tau[0]=0.600000  Tau[1]=0.510000
> Ux= 0.049030, Uy=-0.000193, xFlux= 0.000000, yFlux= 0.000000
> 
> Off to see how we stack up 8)

The fastest VC++ time under Win95 is about 7 minutes, 10 seconds--
my guess is you are using gcc??

----

We need a PPro 200Mhz and compile lb.c with pgcc. Run the benchmark:
./lb

It takes a while like 7 to 14 minutes.

I don't have pgcc over here however I am sure that someone out there does.

ftp://rah.star-gate.com/pub/lb.c

	Tnks,
	Amancio







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703040515.VAA00718>