From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Oct 11 16:50:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CC8C0C8C7 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9D9B7D for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-205.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFAFA3CE50; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u9BGoMeN002109; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:50:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:50:22 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Boris Samorodov Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call-out ports renamed cuadX -> cuauX -- when? Message-Id: <20161011185022.833bf6b8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20161011002250.067f2b85.freebsd@edvax.de> <20161011005255.a54c4215.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:50:25 -0000 On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:37:47 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 11.10.2016 01:52, Polytropon пишет: > > > On my FreeBSD 8 home system, "man 4 sio" contains the following > > convention in the FILES section: > > Just a note. Those are two different device drivers: sio and uart. > It's UART(4) that uses the 'u' notation for cua (call-up asynchronous) > ports. Good finding! Checking "man 4 uart" for 12-CURRENT says: /dev/ttyu? for callin ports /dev/ttyu?.init /dev/ttyu?.lock corresponding callin initial-state and lock-state devices /dev/cuau? for callout ports /dev/cuau?.init /dev/cuau?.lock corresponding callout initial-state and lock-state devices which is exactly the same as I see it on my 8.2 home system. So that part of the mystery has successfully been solved. :-) > I guess, my question may be transformed to "when did the UART driver > become the default". (may be around 7->8)? On 8.2, "uart" part of GENERIC. On 5.2-p8, "sio" is used instead. (Sadly I currently don't have access to FreeBSD systems v6 and v7.) That narrows down the search a bit - you just have to check the revisions of conf/GENERIC to see when the change happened. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...