Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:47:22 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: suspending threads before devices Message-ID: <546791AA.5060204@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=JbMRH0J4jy03sKxeMV-FP7GoE5R--92241rzeMTMo-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <201203202037.q2KKbNfK037014@svn.freebsd.org> <201203211502.14353.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4F6AF1CB.80902@FreeBSD.org> <201203220748.49635.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120322141436.GC2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <54666FD5.6080705@FreeBSD.org> <20141115105819.GJ17068@kib.kiev.ua> <54676BA6.7000202@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-Vmo=JbMRH0J4jy03sKxeMV-FP7GoE5R--92241rzeMTMo-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15/11/2014 18:41, Adrian Chadd wrote: > [snip] > > Hm, would just creating a suspend kernel thread make it easier? > > Ie, instead of you doing the suspend in the context of the calling > process, just have it signal to a kernel thread, so the userland > thread doing the suspend can also be suspended? I do not see any significant difference between the two approaches. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?546791AA.5060204>