From owner-freebsd-standards Mon Aug 12 6: 0:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCC337B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C94C43E7B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7CD07JU020893 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7CD0739020892; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200208121300.g7CD0739020892@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tim Robbins Subject: Re: standards/41576: POSIX compliance of ln(1) Reply-To: Tim Robbins Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The following reply was made to PR standards/41576; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tim Robbins To: Lukas Ertl Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: standards/41576: POSIX compliance of ln(1) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:38:24 +1000 On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:05:10PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > > > > cd /tmp > > > mkdir foo bar > > > ln -s foo bla ### now /tmp/bla symlinks to /tmp/foo > > > ln -sf bar bla ### replace /tmp/bla to point to /tmp/bar, doesn't work > > > > Do you know of any systems this `works' on? /bin/ln and /usr/xpg4/bin/ln > > don't behave this way on Solaris, either. > > On AIX it does. Ok, I've changed the manual page to claim conformance to 1003.2-1992 instead of 1003.1-2001. I'm not sure whether the bug is actually in FreeBSD or AIX - the wording of the standard is quite subtle. I'll leave this PR open so that someone who is certain of the meaning can either restore the 1003.1-2001 conformance claim or correct the FreeBSD implementation. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message