From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 14 11:21:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564A6CF5C8 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467nGN0s5Cz49lM for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x7EBLJh5056176 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:21:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Firefox or what? To: hw Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190812173754.9bbd34f75885d616ae5d074a@gc-24.de> <20190812164800.1bc5581b40de9436a977ea02@sohara.org> <875zn22mmc.fsf@toy.adminart.net> <871rxorh4y.fsf@toy.adminart.net> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <5be8adb1-cf57-9e24-4ce9-27a76cc3ece8@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:21:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <871rxorh4y.fsf@toy.adminart.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 467nGN0s5Cz49lM X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-1.49)[ip: (-5.02), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-2.51), asn: 30722(0.06), country: IT(0.03)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:21:33 -0000 On 8/13/19 11:34 PM, hw wrote: > So how did you get it to work? By following the instructions in the handbook and reading the manual pages. I've had this working for years with NFSv3 and it's working now after I switched to NFSv4. Perhaps if *you* post your configuration, we can look at it and see if something is wrong. > After all this, I wouldn't be surprised if FreeBSD-NFS is incompatible > with Centos-NFS. Sorry, but you didn't say that in your first post. Again, this might be a problem with FreeBSD, a problem in CentOS, a problem with how you configured them... We cannot tell if you don't provide info. Also, I'd be suprised if this only affected FireFox (which was the original subject), as several other programs wouldn't work then... > Have you tried that? No. Everything here is FreeBSD based. > What will you do when you run into bug 220004? I don't know. I'm not using 12 yet: I see .0 releases (of any software) as potentially immature and buggy and I'm absolutely not switching until 12.1 is out. These are bugs I've heard of and are one more reason I'm NOT moving to 12 yet. Then again, I'm happily working with 11.2 and 11.3 and I see no need to upgrade for now. If I ever run into it, I'll see what my options are. If you are stuck with it, I suggest you seek help on freebsd-net. bye av.