Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:48:51 +0200
From:      Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk>
To:        Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Paul Macdonald <paul@ifdnrg.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Fetched Ports index falling out of date
Message-ID:  <28BEF233-B938-45FA-807C-C2814C189CA2@lansing.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20121017064359.GN27371@droso.net>
References:  <507DDB40.7070400@ifdnrg.com> <20121017064359.GN27371@droso.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:43, Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:10:08PM +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>> Hi,
>=20
> Hi Paul,
>>=20
>> For the past 4 days or so, i have noticed an issue where the ports INDEX=20=

>> is out of date.
>>=20
>> e.g
>> portupgrade-2.4.10,2                >   succeeds index (index has 2.4.9.9=
,2)
>> sqlite3-3.7.14.1                    >   succeeds index (index has 3.7.14)=

>>=20
>> This is on both 8.3 REL and 9.0 REL (amd64)
>>=20
>> Ports index update performed by make fetch index in /usr/ports
>> and also tried portsdb -Fu
>>=20
>> Building with Uu fixes issue but i don't fancy doing that locally every d=
ay.
>>=20
>> Anyone else seeing this?
> There was some major work on the FreeBSD cluster machines this weekend
> and as always with such a large change, some things will be overlooked.
> I've talked to the people with the right access and hope it will be
> fixed later today.
>=20
Should be fixed and they are again updated every two hours.

Erwin=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28BEF233-B938-45FA-807C-C2814C189CA2>