From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Jun 15 06:13:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88FC15BD7D3; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49EF78FDF1; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C5E217093; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:13:46 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Cy Schubert , Gerald Pfeifer , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r504198 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20190615061345.GA20346@lonesome.com> References: <201906141610.x5EGAdnN049103@repo.freebsd.org> <20190614165425.GA42674@FreeBSD.org> <8BDC3B40-7FEA-46EA-AE7C-A3C266F6978F@cschubert.com> <20190614175822.GA3336@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190614175822.GA3336@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49EF78FDF1 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.91 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.910,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:13:49 -0000 On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:58:22PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > These old GCC releases are often the only working solution for ports > on sparc64/powerpc I'm not aware of the powerpc dependencies. Do you have a list? We are actively working on ports on powerpc (especially powerpc64). w/rt sparc64, I no longer consider sparc64 viable. There is too much pushback whenever I mention it. My development machines were powered down 1.5 years ago as I turned my attention primarily to powerpc64 and to some extent arm*. mcl