Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:38:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> Cc: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Procedure for introducing new errno values? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000707123729.65777M-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20000513224341.B5564@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 13 May 2000, Dan Nelson wrote: > Don't forget the errno mappings for the Linux/iBSC2/SVR4 compatibility > modules, and src/sys/nfs/nfs_subs.c as well. In both of these cases, what is the appropriate value to choose if the local ENOATTR doesn't map into a convenient remote/emulated errno value? Robert N M Watson robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37 ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1 TIS Labs at Network Associates, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000707123729.65777M-100000>