Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 03 Sep 2016 12:32:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 196326] rubygem framework bug : building occurs in stage phase
Message-ID:  <bug-196326-21402-VVhoiXY1VZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196326-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-196326-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D196326

--- Comment #14 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
yes, we all know for a long time that portmgr makes itself exempt for the s=
ame
rules it imposes on others, and the only way to get it changed is through
portmgr so there's zero checks and balances here.  It's been a sore subject=
 for
a long time.=20=20

Now that you iterated something that wasn't in question:

I'm VERY serious about fixing this.  What is the ACCEPTABLE way forward in
doing so?  If I submit a patch to fix this, I EXPECT that it will be evalua=
ted
fairly and in a timely manner.  (the normal definitions of those words)

I also EXPECT, after all this talk, that some feedback about how this patch
could look would be provided NOW.  Right now you are flexing your muscles b=
ut
not providing any sort of help here.  Are you going to obstruct this or hel=
p?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196326-21402-VVhoiXY1VZ>