Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:49:09 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150913194909.GS36682@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <h9my-e36a-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911171305.GL36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911192801.GM36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150912090128.GN36682@home.opsec.eu> <55F4E408.6010204@freebsd.org> <20150913085345.GO36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150913104015.GQ36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150913130624.GR36682@home.opsec.eu> <h9my-e36a-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > Like this in src/arch/io/timer/timer_signal_provider.cc: > > > > evp.sigev_notify_thread_id = _gettid(); > > evp.sigev_notify_thread_id = pthread_getthreadid_np(); Thanks, will try. > > which is linux-specific. I'm trying to understand whether > > this can be replaced by pthread_self() somehow. > > Why not use kqueue code like OS X? And maybe salvage prior work > > https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/pull/688 Thanks for the pointer, I was not aware of this. I had a look at the kqueue variant, but the kqueue code assumes some OS-X specific elements. Let's get it to build first as a port, then do more fine-tuning. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150913194909.GS36682>