Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:55:12 +0000 From: John Murphy <freebsd001@freeode.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualization Message-ID: <20071101125512.3b50e344@turion.freeode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071101202141.182d193d@meijome.net> References: <47272BAE.5020007@chrononomicon.com> <fg8csj$vak$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071101020920.0eda4dd1@turion.freeode.co.uk> <20071101202141.182d193d@meijome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 20:21:41 +1100 Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 02:09:20 +0000 > John Murphy <freebsd001@freeode.co.uk> wrote: > > > I found a clue to a cure, but qemu was dropping cores when I tried it > > recently. Tried bochs too; I quite like it. > > Hi john, > how do you find bochs compared to qemu, in relation to speed and features? > cheers, Hi Norberto, I haven't done any speed measurements, but qemu seems a lot faster. It may be possible to make bochs use real memory, but qemu defaulting to use it is bound to make a lot of difference. I miss the 'lights' in boch's status bar though... -- Thanks, John.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071101125512.3b50e344>