Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:18:09 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: polling(4) and rl(4) Message-ID: <20040411161809.GC38313@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040411091457.B10991@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20040409164724.GD2461@ip.net.ua> <20040409105503.A35357@xorpc.icir.org> <20040409183117.GA3431@ip.net.ua> <20040411091457.B10991@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 09:14:57AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:31:17PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > ... > > Do you mean it would be okay if I just trimmed the polling support > > in rl(4) to the RX part only? I actually considered doing this, > > just wasn't sure if it is good. ;) >=20 > maybe it's a bit tricky. You'd have to disable rx interrupts, > but keep the tx ones... which makes the call to poll_register > check a few more conditions. >=20 Well, for what I need from rl(4), the per-interface polling(4) control is enough. ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAeW/BUkv4P6juNwoRArcCAJ0doHP3RJdDh7T7N6xdXa2A59CwWwCgiCB8 /BfXvIcHOzhKS5oBjXqP0Fo= =g3Wi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040411161809.GC38313>