From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 14 07:17:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA16498 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 07:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obiwan.psinet.net.au (obiwan.psinet.net.au [203.19.28.59]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA16486 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 07:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by obiwan.psinet.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA00375; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22:05:44 +0800 (WST) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22:05:43 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Michael Bielicki Subject: Re: How is the stability of >SMP ??? In-Reply-To: <4016.861022882@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 14 Apr 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Has anybody experience with the SMP kernel and how stable is it ??? > > Well... > > > I want to recommend it to a customer for running a heavily packed national ro > uter in eastern europe. So it has to be at least as stable as a CISCO 7200 :))) > > Nowhere near that stable. Don't recommend it. :-) > > Jordan > IMHO it would definitely NOT be a good thing if you want something to be a router and it has to "be as stable as a cisco 7200" :) -- Adrian Chadd | UNIX, MS-DOS and Windows ... | (also known as the Good, the bad and the | ugly..)