From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 28 11:13:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1633E16A41C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:13:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz)
Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20E443D48
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:13:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz)
Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 3AC591F87BEE; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:13:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:13:32 +0200
From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Message-ID: <20050628111332.GC48140@isis.sigpipe.cz>
References: <1dbad315050621051525f4c6fc@mail.gmail.com>
	<200506211451.j5LEpA2W024350@lurza.secnetix.de>
	<20050628092126.GB48140@isis.sigpipe.cz>
	<200506281904.48464.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200506281904.48464.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: Michael Schuh <michael.schuh@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:13:34 -0000

# doconnor@gsoft.com.au / 2005-06-28 19:04:18 +0930:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:51, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >     No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
> >     of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just
> >     underperforms. You cannot use a poor location selection
> >     strategy in the driver as an excuse for poor operation.
 
> dd is a useful start, but you shouldn't read too much into the results since, 
> in general, dd doesn't reflect real world usage patterns.

    Huh? Various people have reacted to the "dd doesn't reflect real
    world" with "but I *do* use dd in real world".

-- 
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991