Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 23:19:25 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIC: New Patch (context diff) Message-ID: <20011017231925.B84762@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <3BCC7351.575FAA5@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 10:50:09AM -0700 References: <3BC00ABC.20ECAAD8@mindspring.com> <20011008231046.A10472@panzer.kdm.org> <3BC34FC2.6AF8C872@mindspring.com> <20011010000604.A19388@panzer.kdm.org> <3BC40E04.D89ECB05@mindspring.com> <20011010232020.A27019@panzer.kdm.org> <3BC55201.EC273414@mindspring.com> <20011015002407.A59917@panzer.kdm.org> <3BCB2C87.BEF543A0@mindspring.com> <3BCC7351.575FAA5@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 10:50:09 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > OK, I will rediff and generate context diffs; expect them to > > > > be sent in 24 hours or so from now. > > > > > > It's been longer than that... > > > > Sorry; I've been doing a lot this weekend. I will redo them > > at work today, and resend them tonight... definitely. > > Here are the context diff versions of the coelescing patch. Ahh, I see. In short (at least for the ti(4) driver), you're running the transmit and receive routines until they run without processing any packets. So you catch any packets that came into the receive rings while the transmit routine was running, etc. Or rather you're waiting for a lull in packet transmission and reception to exit the interrupt handler. Does this have any noticeable effect on performance? Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011017231925.B84762>