Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:15:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Jan Lentfer <Jan.Lentfer@web.de> Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla failure on 4.6.2 Message-ID: <15736.65204.564404.552876@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <1031338877.5209.2.camel@jan-linux.lan> References: <20020906040641.GA61111@xor.obsecurity.org> <1031287598.361.2.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.40749.986834.818558@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031329151.342.9.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.58229.652949.93794@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031333130.342.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.59259.51892.798026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031337204.342.49.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1031338877.5209.2.camel@jan-linux.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jan Lentfer writes: > > > Do you know what, if any, differences there are between our g++ and > > > the one linux uses? I'll be the first to admit that I don't know jack > > > about g++/c++. > > > > Sorry, neither do I. However, the builds of Mozilla I've seen for Linux > > Alpha use GCC 2.96 where as I've been testing with 2.95.x. > > Joe, > > I think wie also tried with gcc31 and both with different optimization > levels (-O & -O0), didn't we? All failed at least :-( None of that matters if the calling conventions are different. Some quick debugging reveals we're jumping off into never-never land, rather than really calling the function which is supposed to be invoked. Eg, we end up in: InvokeTestTarget::InvokeTestTarget() (which contains no code, afaik), rather than InvokeTestTarget::AddTwoInts It might be as simple as adding an offset to something, but I'm about out of time for today. My lunch hour only lasts but so long .. ;) Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15736.65204.564404.552876>